Batman Movies

I've been thinking about all this for a while.  And I've prided myself on being a fan of Batman since I was a kid. I mean little kid. I was looking at comic books at 3 or 4. Even if I couldn't understand what I was reading I still enjoyed comic books and was enthralled with the idea of people being able to do things normal people couldn't or wouldn't do. Naturally I read a lot of Batman and Spiderman because they were the most human. Batman because he didn't have any superpowers, and Spiderman, not because he had them, but because he had the most human responses to things he was doing. Batman is more of a favorite because he's sort of the ultimate man. Brains, brawn, detective skills, advanced technology, cool vehicles, hidden lair, sometimes he chases Catwoman around too.

Now I know what you're thinking, it's time for men to put away childish things. But what are you supposed to do when something meant a great deal to you in your childhood, and if the story is written right, as there's a great deal of talented writers not me necessarily, Batman has the ability to appeal to people of all ages. It's an escape. To revere something or someone, even a fictional something that can do things we can't. Look at The Dark Knight Trilogy for instance. I've made some mentions of this before I think, but I'll try to delve a little harder here.

Christopher Nolan took Batman seriously, which is what you'd really have to do with the story anyway. A kid witnesses the murder of his parents in front of him, then proceeds to put his life on the line when he fights the mob, and terrorists with his bare hands. That's not some hokey little pie in the sky thing. There'd have to some kind of examination of that struggle to show the emotion of a child dealing with that to an extremely rich man putting his life and fortune on the line to fight evil. We tend to think of evil as a word used for the cheesy sci-fi movies from the 50s with their dastardly villians or we tend to think of evil as something from comics. Never mind that evil is all around us everyday. People are murdered, robbed, raped, around us or around the world constantly.

Heroes are people we can look up to, either by example, or by trying to do the things they do. Not too mention the fantastic behind all of this, there's a lot of things that hold sentimental value in regards to stuff like this, and most fans just want somebody who'll respect the things we've been around our whole lives as much as we do. That's what should drive the making of a movie. Should. We've seen a lot of hokey takes on Batman. From the tv series to Batman and Robin that horrifying movie with George Clooney. The costume had nipples for crying out loud. NIPPLES!

Now when Nolan rebooted Batman, it opened the door for a lot of things. It respected the material, and put it in a realistic world. He managed to do that for 3 films, which is kind of unheard of, though Marvel Studios, has done it well for a lot more than 3 films... Still DC has had trouble putting more than 3 films together that fans can take seriously.  Nolan's Dark Knight Trilogy produced probably the greatest comic book based movie in The Dark Knight, and provided a springboard for possible expansion of the universe he created. And naturally when Man of Steel came out people assumed that was taking place in the same universe. And now with the unneeded reboot of Zack Synder, Batman is back to square one.

Cringeworthy Ben Affleck is Batman now. Eep. Apart from minor mistakes in Nolan's Trilogy, such as mispronouncing Ra's Al Ghul's  name, it's pronunced "Raysh" not "Raz" and using the phrase "close to the chest" instead of "close of the vest" which a Marvel movie used correctly, I think its a mild dig at DC for messing up the saying, and all this does is show how big douchebag fans like me are quick to point out things like that. Nolan's a very fine director, and did us right by fans, and really did right by storytelling in general. If I'm not mistaken he and his brother are the ones who wrote the scripts, and they've got a knack for setting up loose ends and then tying up those ends into nice emotional and satisfying conclusions.

Zack Synder seems intent on being DC's version of Joss Whedon, which he isn't. He's barely had some mediocre success, while Whedon and the Marvel crew are breaking out into TV and continuing to develop runaway successes with movies. The Dark Knight Trilogy left room to continue the story in a realistic way, while Synder has opted to cram parts from different comic book stories in an effort to give this new universe some history and make to make it seem more established. They didn't even call Batman Batman, and Jesse Eisernberg's Lex Luthor was annoying. I tend to think at this point what comic fans are going to be stuck with is subpar movies with DC Comics' characters and above average movies with Marvel characters. It's "just comic books" but it's what now kids and adults have distracted, entertained, amused, and escaped into fantasy with. And that's all I have to say about that.